Pengaruh Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning (POGIL) Terhadap Kemampuan Problem Solving Siswa

  • Ivan Ashif Ardhana Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Tulungagung
Abstract Views: 433 | PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) Downloads: 501


Download data is not yet available.
Keywords: problem solving, POGIL, verification, Acid-Base


[THE EFFECT OF PROCESS-ORIENTED GUIDED-INQUIRY LEARNING (POGIL) TOWARD STUDENTS’ PROBLEM SOLVING SKILLS]. The aim of this research is to investigate the different impacts of Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning (POGIL) and verification as a learning approach at senior high school students’ problem solving ability grade XI program IPA on acid-base topic. The research design used was quasi experimental. Hypothesis testing uses a t-test with 5% significance utilizing SPSS 21 program for windows. Results show that (1) there is a significant difference in students’ problem solving ability that is taught by POGIL approach and verification, and (2) students that are taught by POGIL approach give better answer’s pattern than students that are taught by verification approach. According to the research result, POGIL could be well promoted learning model to developing problem solving skill on acid-base topics. This result does imply to the next similar research that appropriate exploration of problem solving ability on another contextual chemistry topic such as rate of reaction, chemical equilibrium, and colligative properties. Exploration about metacognition involvement on POGIL also the other implication of this research result that can be deeply analyzed.


Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H. L. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419.

Bilgin, I. (2006). The Effects of Pair Problem Solving Technique Incorporating Polya’s Problem Solving Strategy on Undergraduate Students’ Performance in Chemistry. In Online Submission (Vol. 7, Issue 2, pp. 101–106).

Broman, K., & Parchmann, I. (2014). Students’ application of chemical concepts when solving chemistry problems in different contexts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 516–529.

Cahayningrum, R. D., Nurjayadi, M., & Rahman, A. (2017). Pengembangan E-Module Kimia Berbasis Pogil (Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning) Pada Materi Reaksi Reduksi-Oksidasi Sebagai Sumber Belajar Siswa. JRPK: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia, 7(1), 59–65.

Çalik, M., & Ayas, A. (2005). A cross-age study on the understanding of chemical solutions and their components. International Education Journal, 6(1), 30–41.

De Vos, W., & Pilot, A. (2001). Acids and bases in layers: The stratal structure of an ancient topic. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(4), 494–499.

Dudley Herron, J., & Nurrenbern, S. C. (1999). Chemical Education Research: Improving Chemistry Learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(10), 1354–1361.

Eberlein, T., Kampmeier, J., Minderhout, V., Moog, R. S., Platt, T., Varma-Nelson, P., & White, H. B. (2008). Pedagogies of engagement in science: A comparison of PBL, POGIL, and PLTL. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 36(4), 262–273.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring A New Area of Cognitive — Developmental Inquiry. American Psychological Association, 34(10), 906–911.

Furió-Más, C., Calatayud, M. L., & Bárcenas, S. L. (2007). Surveying students’ conceptual and procedural knowledge of acid-base behavior of substances. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(10), 1717–1724.

Gabel, D. (1999). Improving Teaching and Learning through Chemistry Education Research: A Look to the Future. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(2–4), 548–554.

Greiff, S. (2012). From interactive to collaborative problem solving: Current issues in the Programme for International Student Assessment. From Interactive to Collaborative Problem Solving: Current Issues in the Programme for International Student Assessment, 19(2), 111–121.

Hanson, D. M. (2005). Designing Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Activities. In Faculty Guidebook – A Comprehensive Tool for Improving Faculty Performance (pp. 1–6). Stony Brook University.

Hanson, D. M., Bunce, D., Creegan, F., Moog, R., Padwa, L., Spencer, J., Straumanis, A., & Wolfskill, T. (2006). Instructor ’ s Guide to Guided-Inquiry Learning by With Contributions from other POGIL project personnel : Instructor ’ s Guide to Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning.

Hmelo, C. E., & Williams, S. M. (2018). Learning through Problem Solving. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3–4), 265–270.

Irwanto, Saputro, A. D., Rohaeti, E., & Prodjosantoso, A. K. (2018). Promoting critical thinking and Problem Solving Skills of Preservice Elementary Teachers through Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning (POGIL). International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 777–794.

Jonassen, D. H., & Hung, W. (2008). Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning All Problems are Not Equal: Implications for Problem-Based Learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 2(2), 10–13.

Karadan, M., & Hameed, A. D. (2016). Exploring the Features of Metacognition and Achievement Goals in Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning Instruction ( POGIL ). International Journal of Education and Psychological Research (IJEPR), 5(3), 39–43.

Kipnis, M., & Hofstein, A. (2008). The inquiry laboratory as a source for development of metacognitive skills. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(3), 601–627.

Moog, R. S., & Spencer, J. N. (2008). POGIL: An overview. ACS Symposium Series, 994, 1–13.

Moshman, D. (2018). Metacognitive Theories Revisited. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 599–606.

Nada, E. I., Mursiti, S., & Susilaningsih, E. (2018). Journal of Innovative Science Education Analysis Concepts Redox Using Multiple Representation Based Test Instrument with Computer Based Test ( CBT ) Model model , define , design , develop and disseminate . The purpose of instrument can be used for the an. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 7(1), 101–106.

Nakhleh, M. B. (1994). Students’ models of matter in the context of acid-base chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 71(6), 495–499.

Ningsih, S. M., & Bambang, S. (2012). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (Pogil) Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. UPEJ (Unnes Physics Education Journal), 1(2).

Noh, T., Jeon, K., & Huffman, D. (2005). The Effects of Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving on High School Students’ Chemistry Problem-Solving Performance and Verbal Interactions. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(10), 1558–1564.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 insights and interpretations. In OECD Publishing. 2018 Insights and Interpretations FINAL PDF.pdf

Orgill, M. K., & Sutherland, A. (2008). Undergraduate chemistry students’ perceptions of and misconceptions about buffers and buffer problems. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(2), 131–143.

Parr, B., & Edwards, M. C. (2004). Inquiry-Based Instruction In Secondary Agricultural Education: Problem-Solving - An Old Friend Revisited. Journal of Agricultural Education, 45(4), 106–117.

Pavelich, M. J., & Abraham, M. R. (1979). An Inquiry Format Laboratory Program for. JJournal of Chemical Education, 56(2), 100–103.

Peelle, H. E. (2005). Appreciative Inquiry and Creative Problem Solving (Issue March). University of Phoenix.

Pinarbasi, T. (2007). Turkish undergraduate students’ misconceptions on acids and bases. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 6(1), 23–34.

Raes, A., Schellens, T., De Wever, B., & Vanderhoven, E. (2012). Scaffolding information problem solving in web-based collaborative inquiry learning. Computers and Education, 59(1), 82–94.

Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36(1–2), 111–139.

Sheppard, K. (2006). High school students’ understanding of titrations and related acid-base phenomena. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(1), 32–45.

Sulistyowati, N., Widodo, A. T., & Sumarni, W. (2012). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Guided Discovery Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Kimia. Chemistry in Education, 1(2), 49–55.

Thomas, G. P., & Anderson, D. (2014). Changing the metacognitive orientation of a classroom environment to enhance students’ metacognition regarding chemistry learning. Learning Environments Research, 17(1), 139–155.

Tümay, H. (2016). Emergence, Learning Difficulties, and Misconceptions in Chemistry Undergraduate Students’ Conceptualizations of Acid Strength. Science and Education, 25(1–2), 21–46.

Wood, C. (2006). The development of creative problem solving in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(2), 96–113.

Woods, D. R. (1987). How Might I Teach Problem Solving? In New Directions for Teaching and Learning (Issue 30, pp. 55–71). Jossey-Bass.

Yuliastini, I. B., Rahayu, S., Fajaroh, F., & Mansour, N. (2018). Effectiveness of pogil with ssi context on vocational high school students’ chemistry learning motivation. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 85–95.

Zamista, A. A., & Kaniawati, I. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Dan Kemampuan Kognitif Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika. Edusains, 7(2), 191–201.

Zawadzki, R. (2010). Is process-oriented guided-inquiry learning (POGIL) suitable as a teaching method in Thailand’s higher education? Asian Journal on Education and Learning, 1(2), 66–74.

Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. (2012). Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research. Trends in Current Research, 40, 251–271.