Penggunaan Tes Online “Testmoz” Terintegrasi dengan Googleclassroom sebagai Alternatif Alat Pembelajaran Daring

  • Ivan Ashif Ardhana IAIN Tulungagung
Abstract Views: 408 | PDF Downloads: 1022


Download data is not yet available.
Keywords: Testmoz, google classroom, perception, online learning


[The Use of the Online "Testmoz" Test Integrated with Google Classroom as an Alternative Online Learning Tool]. This study aimed to explore students’ acceptance level of the online-based assessment tool “Testmoz” integrated with Google classroom on chemistry courses. The subjects were 51 students of the fifth semester at Jurusan Tadris Kimia IAIN Tulungagung selected by purposive sampling. The method used in this study was a one-shot case study design. Data obtained from students’ questionnaires and interviews before the Covid-19 pandemic start to begin. The result shows 93,30% accepting the level of Testmoz integrated with Google classroom. These findings were supported by students’ interview data as a user that overall result was positive and shows support. The additional result shows the high interest of rural students through learning innovation using the help of information technology. These results may support the learning process on pandemic conditions that use digital platforms such as the Learning Management System (LMS) as supporting tools of learning in this era.


Al-Maroof, R. A. S., & Al-Emran, M. (2018). Students Acceptance of Google Classroom : An Exploratory Study using PLS-SEM Approach. International Journal of Emerging Technologies, 13(6), 112–123.

Aydın, B., & Demirer, V. (2016). Flipping The Drawhacks of Flipped Calssroom: Effective Tools and Recomendations. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies, 6(1), 33–40.

Azhar, K. A., & Iqbal, N. (2018). Effectiveness of Google Classroom: Teachers. Prizren Social Science Journal, 2(2), 52–66.

Bhat, S., Raju, R., Bikramjit, A., & Souza, R. D. (2018). Leveraging E-Learning through Google Classroom : A Usability Study. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 31(3), 1–7.

Bonis, S. De, & Bonis, N. De. (2011). Going Green : Managing a Paperless Classroom. US-China Education Review, 1, 83–87.

Carley, H. (2014). Going Green : The Paperless Classroom. Global Issues in Language Education, 91, 10–13.

Cirit, C. (2015). Assessing ELT Pre-Service Teachers via Web 2 . 0 Tools : Perceptions toward Traditional , Online and Alternative Assessment. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3), 9–19.

Eichler, J. F., & Peeples, J. (2013). Online homework put to the test: A report on the impact of two online learning systems on student performance in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(9), 1137–1143.

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (M. Ryan (ed.); 7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Gilster, P., & Watson, T. (1999). by. Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal, 2(2), 139–154.

Heggart, K. R., & Yoo, J. (2018). Getting the Most from Google Classroom : A Pedagogical Framework for Tertiary Educators. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 140–153.

Hofstein, J. D., Tucker, L., Swarner, K., Moriarty, D., Tegas, L., Demarte, N., & Adiletta, N. (2014). Using iPads in the Chemistry Classroom : Focusing on Paperless Education and Identification and Directed use of Pedagogically Directed Applications Using iPads in the Chemistry Classroom : Focusing on Paperless Education and Identification and Directed us. The Chemical Educator, 18, 248–254.

Iftakhar, S. (2016). Google classroom: what works and how? Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 3, 12–18.

Li, Y., & Ranieri, M. (2013). Educational and social correlates of the digital divide for rural and urban children: A study on primary school students in a provincial city of China. Computers and Education, 60(1), 197–209.

Marius, P., & Anggoro, S. (2014). Profil pengguna internet indonesia 2014 (1st ed.). Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia.

Milton, M., & Vozzo, L. (2013). Journal of Literacy and Technology : Volume 14 , Number 1 : March 2013. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 14(1), 72–97.

Muklason, A., Mahananto, F., Anggraeni, W., Djunaid, A., & Riksakomara, E. (2019). Pimpinan Redaksi Faizal Mahananto Dewan Redaksi Eko Wahyu Tyas Darmaningrat Tata Pelaksana Usaha Achmad Syaiful Susanto Rini Ekowati Sekretariat. Inspirasi Profesional Sistem Informasi, 8(2), 109–116.

Richards-babb, M., Curtis, R., Georgieva, Z., Penn, J. H., States, U., & States, U. (2017). Assessment of Learning in Organic Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(11), 1813–1819.

Shaharanee, I. N. M., Jamil, J. M., & Syamimi, S. S. M. (2014). The Application of Google Classroom as a Tool for Teaching and Learning. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 8(10), 8–11.

Sudarsana, I. K., Bagus, I., Anggara, M., & Temon, I. N. (2019). The use of Google classroom in the learning process. International Conference on Advance and Scientific Innovation, 1–5.

Tang, J. K. T., Yeung, H., Man, Y., Li, K., Wong, T., Pang, W., & Ho, W. (2015). A Web-Based Computer-Aided Assessment Creation and Invigilation System. In Technology in Education. Transforming Educational Practices with Technology (pp. 74–85).

Ventayen, M. R. J., Estira, K. L. A., Guzman, M. J. De, Cabaluna, C. M., & Espinosa, N. N. (2018). Usability Evaluation of Google Classroom : Basis for the Adaptation of GSuite E-Learning Platform. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 5(1), 47–51.

Wijaya, A. (2016). Analysis of Factors Affecting the Use of Google Classroom to Support Lectures Andri Wijaya. International Conference on Information Technology and Engineering Application, February, 19–20.

Wilson, J. R., Briere, J. L., & Nahachewsky, J. (2015). Rural High School Students ’ Digital Literacy. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 16(2), 55–95