Penggunaan Tes Online “Testmoz” Terintegrasi dengan Googleclassroom sebagai Alternatif Alat Pembelajaran Daring

Authors

  • Ivan Ashif Ardhana IAIN Tulungagung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36052/andragogi.v8i2.182

Keywords:

Testmoz, google classroom, perception, online learning

Abstract

[The Use of the Online "Testmoz" Test Integrated with Google Classroom as an Alternative Online Learning Tool]. This study aimed to explore students’ acceptance level of the online-based assessment tool “Testmoz” integrated with Google classroom on chemistry courses. The subjects were 51 students of the fifth semester at Jurusan Tadris Kimia IAIN Tulungagung selected by purposive sampling. The method used in this study was a one-shot case study design. Data obtained from students’ questionnaires and interviews before the Covid-19 pandemic start to begin. The result shows 93,30% accepting the level of Testmoz integrated with Google classroom. These findings were supported by students’ interview data as a user that overall result was positive and shows support. The additional result shows the high interest of rural students through learning innovation using the help of information technology. These results may support the learning process on pandemic conditions that use digital platforms such as the Learning Management System (LMS) as supporting tools of learning in this era.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Maroof, R. A. S., & Al-Emran, M. (2018). Students Acceptance of Google Classroom : An Exploratory Study using PLS-SEM Approach. International Journal of Emerging Technologies, 13(6), 112–123.

Aydın, B., & Demirer, V. (2016). Flipping The Drawhacks of Flipped Calssroom: Effective Tools and Recomendations. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies, 6(1), 33–40.

Azhar, K. A., & Iqbal, N. (2018). Effectiveness of Google Classroom: Teachers. Prizren Social Science Journal, 2(2), 52–66.

Bhat, S., Raju, R., Bikramjit, A., & Souza, R. D. (2018). Leveraging E-Learning through Google Classroom : A Usability Study. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 31(3), 1–7.

Bonis, S. De, & Bonis, N. De. (2011). Going Green : Managing a Paperless Classroom. US-China Education Review, 1, 83–87.

Carley, H. (2014). Going Green : The Paperless Classroom. Global Issues in Language Education, 91, 10–13.

Cirit, C. (2015). Assessing ELT Pre-Service Teachers via Web 2 . 0 Tools : Perceptions toward Traditional , Online and Alternative Assessment. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3), 9–19.

Eichler, J. F., & Peeples, J. (2013). Online homework put to the test: A report on the impact of two online learning systems on student performance in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(9), 1137–1143. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed3006264

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (M. Ryan (ed.); 7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Gilster, P., & Watson, T. (1999). by. Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal, 2(2), 139–154.

Heggart, K. R., & Yoo, J. (2018). Getting the Most from Google Classroom : A Pedagogical Framework for Tertiary Educators. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 140–153.

Hofstein, J. D., Tucker, L., Swarner, K., Moriarty, D., Tegas, L., Demarte, N., & Adiletta, N. (2014). Using iPads in the Chemistry Classroom : Focusing on Paperless Education and Identification and Directed use of Pedagogically Directed Applications Using iPads in the Chemistry Classroom : Focusing on Paperless Education and Identification and Directed us. The Chemical Educator, 18, 248–254. https://doi.org/10.1333/s00897132505a

Iftakhar, S. (2016). Google classroom: what works and how? Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 3, 12–18.

Li, Y., & Ranieri, M. (2013). Educational and social correlates of the digital divide for rural and urban children: A study on primary school students in a provincial city of China. Computers and Education, 60(1), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.001

Marius, P., & Anggoro, S. (2014). Profil pengguna internet indonesia 2014 (1st ed.). Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia.

Milton, M., & Vozzo, L. (2013). Journal of Literacy and Technology : Volume 14 , Number 1 : March 2013. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 14(1), 72–97.

Muklason, A., Mahananto, F., Anggraeni, W., Djunaid, A., & Riksakomara, E. (2019). Pimpinan Redaksi Faizal Mahananto Dewan Redaksi Eko Wahyu Tyas Darmaningrat Tata Pelaksana Usaha Achmad Syaiful Susanto Rini Ekowati Sekretariat. Inspirasi Profesional Sistem Informasi, 8(2), 109–116.

Richards-babb, M., Curtis, R., Georgieva, Z., Penn, J. H., States, U., & States, U. (2017). Assessment of Learning in Organic Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(11), 1813–1819. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00294.Student

Shaharanee, I. N. M., Jamil, J. M., & Syamimi, S. S. M. (2014). The Application of Google Classroom as a Tool for Teaching and Learning. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 8(10), 8–11.

Sudarsana, I. K., Bagus, I., Anggara, M., & Temon, I. N. (2019). The use of Google classroom in the learning process. International Conference on Advance and Scientific Innovation, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012165

Tang, J. K. T., Yeung, H., Man, Y., Li, K., Wong, T., Pang, W., & Ho, W. (2015). A Web-Based Computer-Aided Assessment Creation and Invigilation System. In Technology in Education. Transforming Educational Practices with Technology (pp. 74–85).

Ventayen, M. R. J., Estira, K. L. A., Guzman, M. J. De, Cabaluna, C. M., & Espinosa, N. N. (2018). Usability Evaluation of Google Classroom : Basis for the Adaptation of GSuite E-Learning Platform. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 5(1), 47–51.

Wijaya, A. (2016). Analysis of Factors Affecting the Use of Google Classroom to Support Lectures Andri Wijaya. International Conference on Information Technology and Engineering Application, February, 19–20.

Wilson, J. R., Briere, J. L., & Nahachewsky, J. (2015). Rural High School Students ’ Digital Literacy. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 16(2), 55–95

Downloads

Published

2020-12-31

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020): Andragogi: Jurnal Diklat Teknis Pendidikan dan Keagamaan

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).