Analisis Bibliometrik Tentang Tren Manajemen Pengetahuan Berdasarkan Afiliasi Penulis dari Indonesia

Authors

  • Hari Soesanto Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Provinsi DKI Jakarta
  • Radite Teguh Handalani Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Provinsi DKI Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36052/andragogi.v11i1.304

Keywords:

manajemen pengetahuan, analisis bibliometrik, sumber daya manusia, e-learning, VOSviewer

Abstract

Knowledge management is essential for an organization, especially in managing the knowledge possessed by its human resources to be more effective in achieving its goals. In its development, research trends on global knowledge management have crossed national borders (across countries). However, research written by authors whose affiliates are from Indonesia is exciting and essential to study in research mapping based on the author's country affiliation and its various findings. This study aims to map an outline of the current state of research on knowledge management based on author affiliations from Indonesia and see future research opportunities, especially related to research trends and novelties. The method used is bibliometric analysis with the help of VOSviewer software and the Scopus database. The co-authorship and co-occurrence of keywords were analyzed on 125 documents in 2017-2021. The results showed 12 author network clusters and five keyword clusters. The most dominant keywords that emerged included knowledge management, knowledge, Indonesia, knowledge management systems, and e-learning.

(Manajemen pengetahuan sangat penting bagi suatu organisasi terutama dalam mengelola pengetahuan yang dimiliki oleh sumber daya manusia pada organisasi supaya lebih efektif dalam mencapai tujuannya. Dalam perkembangannya, tren penelitian tentang manajemen pengetahuan secara global telah melampaui batas negara (lintas negara). Akan tetapi penelitian yang ditulis oleh penulis yang afiliasinya dari Indonesia menarik dan penting dan relatif baru, untuk diteliti dalam rangka pemetaan penelitian berdasarkan afiliasi negara penulis beserta berbagai temuannya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memetakan garis besar keadaan penelitian terkini tentang manajemen pengetahuan berdasarkan afiliasi penulis dari Indonesia dan melihat peluang penelitian ke depan terutama berkaitan trend penelitian dan kebaruan (novelty). Metode yang digunakan yaitu analisis bibliometrik dengan bantuan perangkat lunak VOSviewer dan database Scopus. Analisis co-authorship dan co-occurrence kata kunci dilakukan terhadap 125 dokumen pada tahun 2017-2021. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat 12 klaster jejaring penulis dan terdapat 5 klaster kata kunci. Kata kunci yang paling dominan muncul antara lain knowledge management, knowledge, Indonesia, knowledge management system, dan e-learning).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baker, H. K., Kumar, S., & Pandey, N. (2020). A Bibliometric Analysis of Managerial Finance: A Retrospective. Managerial Finance, 46(11), 1495–1517. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-06-2019-0277

Becerra-Fernandez, I. and Sabherwal, R. (2010). Knowledge Management: Systems and Processes. Armonk (N.Y.); London : M.E. Sharpe.

Cisneros, L., Ibanescu, M., Keen, C., Lobato-Calleros, O., & Niebla-Zatarain, J. (2018). Bibliometric Study of Family Business Succession Between 1939 and 2017: Mapping and Analyzing Authors’ Networks. Scientometrics, 117(2), 919–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2889-1

Danvila-del-Valle, I., Estévez-Mendoza, C., & Lara, F. J. (2019). Human Resources Training: A Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Business Research, 101, 627–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.026

Dewi, A. P., Tjakratmadja, J. H., & Hendarman, A. F. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Knowledge Management in Tax Administration. JDM (Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen), 13(2), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.15294/jdm.v13i2.35831

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How To Conduct A Bibliometric Analysis: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., & Pattnaik, D. (2020). Forty-five years of Journal of Business Research: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.039

Fauzi, M. A. (2022). A Bibliometric Review on Knowledge Management In Tourism and Hospitality: Past, Present And Future Trends. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(6), 2178–2201. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-03-2022-0381

Fernandez, I. B., & Sabherwal, R. (2010). Knowledge Management: Systems and Processes. New York (NY): M.E. Sharpe, Inc.

Groff, T.R. and Jones, T.P. (2003). Introduction to Knowledge Management. Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington.

Li, X., Yu, J., & Shu, C. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Trends on Post-Stroke Pneumonia: Current Development Status and Research Frontiers. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.950859

Liebowitz, J. (1999). Key Ingredients to the Success of an Organization’s Knowledge Management Strategy. Knowledge and Process Management, 6(1), 37–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1441(199903)6:1<37::AID-KPM40>3.0.CO;2-M

Muttaqi, F. (2020). Build and Design Knowledge Management System for Sharing Material Teacher. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1511(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1511/1/012016

Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Polanyi, M. (1967). The Tacit Knowledge Dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Sanguankaew, P., & Vathanophas Ractham, V. (2019). Bibliometric Review of Research on Knowledge Management and Sustainability, 1994–2018. Sustainability, 11(16), 4388. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164388

Schiuma, G., Kumar, S., Sureka, R., & Joshi, R. (2023). Research Constituents and Authorship Patterns in the Knowledge Management Research and Practice: A Bibliometric Analysis. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 21(1), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2020.1848365

Sauermann, H. (2009). Danny P. Wallace (2007). Knowledge Management: Historical and Cross-Disciplinary Themes. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited. 227 pages. Human Resource Management, 48(3), 465–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20290

Shashi, Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., & Merigo, J. M. (2021). Mapping Knowledge Management Research: a Bibliometric Overview. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 28(1), 239–267. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2021.14088

Tiwana, A. (1999). The Knowledge Management Toolkit. Practical Techniques for Building a Knowledge Management System. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Thomson Reuters (2008). White papers Using Bibliometrics: A Guide to Evaluating Research Performance with Citation Data. Thomson Reuters.

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, A Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Zhang, Y., You, X., Huang, S., Wang, M., & Dong, J. (2022). Knowledge Atlas on the Relationship between Water Management and Constructed Wetlands—A Bibliometric Analysis Based on CiteSpace. Sustainability, 14(14), 8288. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148288

Downloads

Published

2023-06-19

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023): Andragogi: Jurnal Diklat Teknis Pendidikan dan Keagamaan

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).